What changed between revision 1 and revision 2, compared over the article's markdown source with its frontmatter — so a change to status, evidence or reversibility shows up as the edit it is.
Older · revision 1
Import· initial corpus import, not an edit
Initial import of content/uterus-transplantation.md — the filesystem corpus, unchanged. Not an edit.
16.6 kB
Revision 1
Revision 2
lines 8–14 → 8–147 unchanged lines not shown
categories: ["reproduction", "bodies"]categories: ["reproduction", "bodies"]tags: ["transplantation", "reproduction", "infertility", "pregnancy", "immunosuppression", "ivf", "surgery"]tags: ["transplantation", "reproduction", "infertility", "pregnancy", "immunosuppression", "ivf", "surgery"]summary: "A temporary transplant of a donated uterus that lets a woman without a working one carry a pregnancy, then is removed so that immunosuppression can stop."summary: "A temporary transplant of a donated uterus that lets a woman without a working one carry a pregnancy, then is removed so that immunosuppression can stop."updated: "2026-07-27"updated: "2026-10-29"humanEvidence: "Dozens of live births have been reported since the first in Sweden in 2014, from both living and deceased donors; graft loss and preterm delivery are common."humanEvidence: "Dozens of live births have been reported since the first in Sweden in 2014, from both living and deceased donors; graft loss and preterm delivery are common."access: "Performed at a small number of specialist centres, largely under research protocols, rarely reimbursed, and only after the recipient has completed IVF."access: "Performed at a small number of specialist centres, largely under research protocols, rarely reimbursed, and only after the recipient has completed IVF."reversibility: "difficult"reversibility: "difficult"lines 35–42 → 35–4220 unchanged lines not shown
own cannot carry a pregnancy, so that she can gestate and deliver a child. Almost alone amongown cannot carry a pregnancy, so that she can gestate and deliver a child. Almost alone amongtransplants, it is intended from the outset to be temporary: the graft is removed after one or twotransplants, it is intended from the outset to be temporary: the graft is removed after one or twobirths so that lifelong immunosuppression is never required. Since the first live birth in Sweden inbirths so that lifelong immunosuppression is never required. Since the first live birth in Sweden in2014, dozens of children have been born this way — a record no engineered substitute for the uterus,2014, dozens of children have been born this way, a record that no engineered substitute for thethe [[artificial-womb]] included, can claim.uterus, the [[artificial-womb]] included, can claim. ```keyfacts```keyfacts[[lines 48–98 → 48–995 unchanged lines not shown
## Who it is for## Who it is for The indication is absolute uterine factor infertility: the uterus is absent, or present but incapableThe indication is absolute uterine factor infertility, in which the uterus is absent or is presentof sustaining a pregnancy. The largest congenital cause is Mayer–Rokitansky–Küster–Hauserbut incapable of sustaining a pregnancy. The largest congenital cause issyndrome, a form of Müllerian agenesis in which the uterus and upper vagina fail to develop while theMayer-Rokitansky-Küster-Hauser syndrome, a form of Müllerian agenesis in which the uterus and upperovaries, hormones, and karyotype are typically normal; it occurs in something on the order of one invagina fail to develop while the ovaries, hormones and karyotype are typically normal. It occurs in4,000 to 5,000 female births. The acquired causes are more varied: hysterectomy for postpartumsomething on the order of one in 4,000 to 5,000 female births. The acquired causes are more varied:haemorrhage, cervical cancer, or fibroids; severe intrauterine adhesions; radiation injury.hysterectomy for postpartum haemorrhage, cervical cancer or fibroids; severe intrauterine adhesions;and radiation injury. The detail that makes the procedure attractive to candidates is that the ovaries usually work. A womanThe procedure appeals to candidates because their ovaries usually work. A woman with Müllerianwith Müllerian agenesis produces her own oocytes, so a child gestated in a transplanted uterus isagenesis produces her own oocytes, so a child gestated in a transplanted uterus is genetically hers.genetically hers. The alternatives — adoption and gestational surrogacy — either sever that link orOf the alternatives, adoption severs that genetic link and gestational surrogacy places theplace the pregnancy in another woman's body, and surrogacy is prohibited or legally unenforceable inpregnancy in another woman's body. Surrogacy is also prohibited or legally unenforceable in much ofmuch of Europe, including Sweden, where the first sustained programme was built.Europe, including Sweden, where the first sustained programme was built. ## How it works## How it works Conception cannot happen the ordinary way. The graft is anastomosed to blood vessels but not to theConception cannot happen the ordinary way. The graft is anastomosed to blood vessels but not to therecipient's fallopian tubes, so sperm and egg never meet inside her. Every candidate thereforerecipient's fallopian tubes, so sperm and egg never meet inside her. Every candidate thereforecompletes in vitro fertilisation, and most programmes bank frozen embryos before the transplant iscompletes in vitro fertilisation, and most programmes bank frozen embryos before the transplant isattempted; this is the same laboratory pipeline that supports [[embryo-selection]], used here simplyattempted. This is the same laboratory pipeline that supports [[embryo-selection]], used here simplyto produce embryos before there is a uterus to carry them.to produce embryos before there is a uterus to carry them. The donor operation removes the uterus with long vascular pedicles, usually including segments of theThe donor operation removes the uterus with long vascular pedicles, usually including segments ofinternal iliac vessels. Venous drainage is the technical crux: uterine veins are thin-walled,the internal iliac vessels. Venous drainage is the hardest technical step. Uterine veins arevariable, and awkward to sew, and some teams take utero-ovarian veins instead. In the recipient, thethin-walled, variable and awkward to sew, and some teams take utero-ovarian veins instead. In thegraft is joined to the external iliac vessels, suspended from the pelvic ligaments, and connected torecipient, the graft is joined to the external iliac vessels, suspended from the pelvic ligaments,a vaginal cuff. Menstruation returning within weeks to months is the first sign that the graft isand connected to a vaginal cuff. The return of menstruation, within weeks to months, is the firstalive.sign that the graft is alive. Nothing reconnects the nerves. A transplanted uterus is denervated, which means the recipient doesNothing reconnects the nerves. A transplanted uterus is denervated, so the recipient does not feelnot feel contractions and cannot labour normally; every reported delivery has been by caesareancontractions and cannot labour normally, and every reported delivery has been by caesarean section.section. Immunosuppression is typically tacrolimus-based and adjusted for pregnancy — mycophenolateImmunosuppression is typically based on tacrolimus and adjusted for pregnancy; mycophenolate isis teratogenic and is exchanged for an alternative before any embryo transfer. Rejection is monitoredteratogenic and is exchanged for an alternative before any embryo transfer. Rejection is monitoredby cervical biopsy rather than by symptoms, because episodes are common and frequently silent, andby cervical biopsy rather than by symptoms, because episodes are common and frequently silent. Mostmost are reversed with corticosteroids.are reversed with corticosteroids. Embryo transfer is generally deferred for several months to a year after transplantation. After oneEmbryo transfer is generally deferred for several months to a year after transplantation. After oneor two live births, the graft is removed in a second major operation and the drugs stop.or two live births, the graft is removed in a second major operation and the drugs stop. > [!key] The transplant meant to end> [!key] The transplant meant to end> A solid-organ transplant is normally kept for as long as it lasts, and the recipient accepts> A solid-organ transplant is normally kept for as long as it lasts, and the recipient accepts> immunosuppression, infection risk, and raised cancer risk for the rest of their life as the price of> immunosuppression, infection risk and raised cancer risk for the rest of their life as the price> staying alive. A uterus is not life-sustaining, so the calculation inverts: the graft is worth> of staying alive. A uterus is not life-sustaining, so the calculation is reversed. The graft is> keeping only while it is being used, and the standard of success includes taking it out. That is why> worth keeping only while it is being used, and the standard of success includes taking it out. Its> its reversibility differs from the implanted devices and edited cells covered elsewhere on this wiki> reversibility therefore differs from that of the implanted devices and edited cells covered> — undoing it requires surgery, but the undoing is part of the plan.> elsewhere on this wiki: undoing it requires surgery, but the undoing is part of the plan. ## Development history## Development history lines 101–212 → 102–2142 unchanged lines not shown
{ "year": "2000", "title": "First human attempt", "text": "A team in Saudi Arabia transplants a uterus from a living donor. The graft is removed after about three months when its blood supply thromboses." }, { "year": "2000", "title": "First human attempt", "text": "A team in Saudi Arabia transplants a uterus from a living donor. The graft is removed after about three months when its blood supply thromboses." }, { "year": "2011", "title": "First deceased-donor transplant", "text": "A team at Akdeniz University in Turkey transplants a uterus from a multi-organ donor. The first pregnancies are lost; a live birth from the same graft is reported only years afterwards." }, { "year": "2011", "title": "First deceased-donor transplant", "text": "A team at Akdeniz University in Turkey transplants a uterus from a multi-organ donor. The first pregnancies are lost; a live birth from the same graft is reported only years afterwards." }, { "year": "2012", "title": "The Montreal Criteria", "text": "Lefkowitz, Edwards and Balayla publish conditions for ethically permissible uterine transplantation, covering recipient, donor and institutional requirements." }, { "year": "2012", "title": "The Montreal Criteria", "text": "Lefkowitz, Edwards and Balayla publish conditions for ethically permissible uterine transplantation, covering recipient, donor and institutional requirements." }, { "year": "2012–2013", "title": "The Gothenburg trial", "text": "Mats Brännström's group at the University of Gothenburg performs nine living-donor transplants, most from mothers and other close relatives, after more than a decade of animal work." }, { "year": "2012-2013", "title": "The Gothenburg trial", "text": "Mats Brännström's group at the University of Gothenburg performs nine living-donor transplants, most from mothers and other close relatives, after more than a decade of animal work." }, { "year": "2014", "title": "First live birth", "text": "A boy is born in Sweden to a recipient with Müllerian agenesis, delivered preterm by caesarean after she develops pre-eclampsia." }, { "year": "2014", "title": "First live birth", "text": "A boy is born in Sweden to a recipient with Müllerian agenesis, delivered preterm by caesarean after she develops pre-eclampsia." }, { "year": "2017", "title": "United States and deceased-donor births", "text": "Baylor University Medical Center in Dallas reports the first birth in the United States; a team in São Paulo reports the first anywhere from a deceased donor." }, { "year": "2017", "title": "United States and deceased-donor births", "text": "Baylor University Medical Center in Dallas reports the first birth in the United States; a team in São Paulo reports the first anywhere from a deceased donor." }, { "year": "2016–2025", "title": "Diffusion", "text": "Programmes open in more than a dozen countries, robotic donor hysterectomy is introduced to shorten the donor operation, and the United Kingdom reports its first birth in 2025." } { "year": "2016-2025", "title": "Diffusion", "text": "Programmes open in more than a dozen countries, robotic donor hysterectomy is introduced to shorten the donor operation, and the United Kingdom reports its first birth in 2025." }]]`````` The first attempt, in Saudi Arabia in 2000, established that the graft could survive at all and thatThe first attempt, in Saudi Arabia in 2000, established that the graft could survive at all and thatvascular thrombosis was the thing most likely to kill it.[^fageeh2002] The Turkish case a decade latervascular thrombosis was the thing most likely to kill it.[^fageeh2002] The Turkish case a decadeshowed that a uterus from a deceased donor could be transplanted and could conceive.[^ozkan2013] Thelater showed that a uterus from a deceased donor could be transplanted and couldfirst pregnancies there were lost, and a live birth from that graft came only years afterwards. Whatconceive.[^ozkan2013] The first pregnancies there were lost, and a live birth from that graft cameseparated the Swedish programme from both was preparation: more than a decade of work in rodents,only years afterwards. The Swedish programme differed from both in its preparation. It drew on moresheep, and non-human primates on vascular technique and on whether a transplantedthan a decade of work in rodents, sheep and non-human primates on vascular technique, and on whetheruterus could support gestation in any species before it was tried in a person. The 2014 birth wasa transplanted uterus could support gestation in any species, before the procedure was tried in areported with the recipient, the donor, the immunosuppressive regimen, and the pregnancy courseperson. The 2014 birth was reported with the recipient, the donor, the immunosuppressive regimen anddescribed in full.[^brannstrom2015] The United States programme at Baylor followed a similarthe course of the pregnancy described in full.[^brannstrom2015] The United States programme atstructured-trial model,[^testa2018] and the Brazilian case removed the assumption that a living donorBaylor followed a similar structured-trial model,[^testa2018] and the Brazilian case removed thewas necessary.[^ejzenberg2019]assumption that a living donor was necessary.[^ejzenberg2019] ## Outcomes so far## Outcomes so far Fewer than a hundred births have been reported worldwide, from programmes on several continents,Fewer than a hundred births have been reported worldwide, from programmes on several continents. Theand the count is compiled through an international registry maintained by the transplant societiescount is compiled through an international registry maintained by the transplant societies, not byrather than through any regulator. On the [[technology-readiness-level|standard readiness scale]] theany regulator. On the [[technology-readiness-level|standard readiness scale]] the procedure sitsprocedure sits near the top — a complete system, qualified through repeated use — while remainingnear the top, as a complete system qualified through repeated use, yet it remains concentrated in aconcentrated in a small number of centres with the surgical, reproductive-medicine, and transplantsmall number of centres that have the necessary surgical, reproductive-medicine and transplantexpertise it requires in one building.expertise in one building. The failures are as informative as the births. A substantial minority of grafts have been lost, mostThe failures are as informative as the births. A substantial minority of grafts have been lost, mostof them in the first weeks and most to thrombosis at the vascular anastomoses, which forces anof them in the first weeks and most to thrombosis at the vascular anastomoses; the loss forces anunplanned hysterectomy and ends the attempt. Among pregnancies that continue, preterm delivery andunplanned hysterectomy and ends the attempt. Among pregnancies that continue, preterm delivery andhypertensive disorders including pre-eclampsia are considerably more frequent than in the generalhypertensive disorders including pre-eclampsia are considerably more frequent than in the generalobstetric population, and caesarean delivery is universal by design. The children have generally beenobstetric population, and caesarean delivery is universal by design. The children have generallyof appropriate size for their gestational age, and no consistent pattern of malformation has beenbeen of appropriate size for their gestational age, and no consistent pattern of malformation hasreported, but the oldest of them are barely into their second decade and systematic long-termbeen reported. The oldest of them, however, are barely into their second decade, and systematicfollow-up is thin.long-term follow-up is thin. > [!caution] What the birth count does not show> [!caution] What the birth count does not show> Announcements report births; they report graft losses, failed embryo transfers, and recipients who> Announcements report births, and they report graft losses, failed embryo transfers and recipients> never became pregnant far less consistently. The published denominator — how many women were> who never became pregnant far less consistently. The published denominator (how many women were> screened, transplanted, and left without a child — is incomplete, and no randomised or matched> screened, transplanted, and left without a child) is incomplete. No randomised or matched> comparison against surrogacy or adoption exists or is likely to. A live birth demonstrates that the> comparison against surrogacy or adoption exists, and none is likely. A live birth demonstrates> procedure can work. It does not establish how often it does.> that the procedure can work; it does not establish how often it does. ## Donors, risk, and consent## Donors, risk, and consent Living donors have most often been the recipient's mother or sister, and postmenopausal uteri haveLiving donors have most often been the recipient's mother or sister, and postmenopausal uteri haveproved usable — the donor in the Swedish case that produced the first birth was a family friend whoproved usable. The donor in the Swedish case that produced the first birth was a family friend whohad been through menopause years earlier. The donation is not a small thing. Removing a uterus with vascular pedicles long enoughhad been through menopause years earlier. The donation is a substantial undertaking. Removing ato graft is a longer and more dissection-heavy operation than a standard hysterectomy, with ureteraluterus with vascular pedicles long enough to graft is a longer operation, with more dissection, thaninjury as the characteristic complication; robotic assistance was introduced partly to reduce thata standard hysterectomy, and its characteristic complication is ureteral injury; robotic assistanceburden. For the donor the procedure is permanent in a way it is not for the recipient.was introduced partly to reduce that burden. For the donor the procedure is permanent in a way it isnot for the recipient. Deceased donation removes that objection entirely and expands the pool, at the cost of less workup,Deceased donation removes that objection entirely and expands the pool. The cost is less workup,less scheduling control, and a graft whose history is known only from records. Which source isless control over scheduling, and a graft whose history is known only from records. Which source ispreferable is an open practical question rather than a settled one, and programmes have split.preferable remains an open practical question, and programmes have split on it. > [!debate] A non-lifesaving transplant with three parties at risk> [!debate] A non-lifesaving transplant with three parties at risk> Critics argue that subjecting a healthy woman to a long operation, a second woman to> Critics argue that the procedure subjects a healthy woman to a long operation, a second woman to> immunosuppression, and a fetus to exposure to those drugs — for an outcome that is not survival but> immunosuppression, and a fetus to exposure to those drugs, for an outcome that is gestation and> gestation — sits outside what transplantation has previously justified, and that surrogacy or> not survival. In their view this sits outside what transplantation has previously justified, and> adoption achieves parenthood without any of it. Supporters answer that the same reasoning would> surrogacy or adoption achieves parenthood without any of it. Supporters answer that the same> forbid living kidney donation to a patient who could dialyse, that surrogacy is unavailable or> reasoning would forbid living kidney donation to a patient who could dialyse, that surrogacy is> illegal for many candidates, and that carrying a pregnancy is what these women are asking for and> unavailable or illegal for many candidates, and that carrying a pregnancy is what these women are> is not interchangeable with obtaining a child. The Montreal Criteria were an early attempt to fix> asking for and is not interchangeable with obtaining a child. The Montreal Criteria were an early> the boundary,[^montreal2012] and professional bodies have generally held that the procedure is> attempt to fix the boundary,[^montreal2012] and professional bodies have generally held that the> defensible under research protocols with independent donor advocacy.[^asrm2018]> procedure is defensible under research protocols with independent donor advocacy.[^asrm2018] ## Limitations and open questions## Limitations and open questions Cost and concentration are the immediate limits. The procedure requires a transplant team, aCost and concentration are the immediate limits. The procedure requires a transplant team, areproductive endocrinology unit, a high-risk obstetric service, and years of follow-up; it is rarelyreproductive endocrinology unit, a high-risk obstetric service, and years of follow-up. It is rarelyreimbursed, and the pattern described in [[access-and-inequality]] applies with unusual force to anreimbursed, and the pattern described in [[access-and-inequality]] applies with unusual force to anintervention that is expensive, elective, and available in a handful of cities.intervention that is expensive, elective, and available in a handful of cities. Whether transgender women could be recipients is discussed in the literature; no such transplant hasWhether transgender women could be recipients is discussed in the literature; no such transplant hasbeen reported. The obstacles are anatomical and endocrine rather than ideological — a male pelvis hasbeen reported. The obstacles are anatomical and endocrine rather than ideological. A male pelvis hasdifferent vascular geometry and no vaginal canal to attach the graftdifferent vascular geometry and no vaginal canal to attach the graft to without prior surgery, andto without prior surgery, and the hormonal support of a pregnancy would have to be supplied entirelythe hormonal support of a pregnancy would have to be supplied entirely by drugs. The question is aby drugs — and the question is a recurring test case for arguments aboutrecurring test case for arguments about [[morphological-freedom]] and for the framing of medical[[morphological-freedom]] and for the framing of medical need set out inneed set out in [[disability-rights-and-enhancement]]. It is also the version of the procedure most[[disability-rights-and-enhancement]]. It is also the version of the procedure most likely to belikely to be argued about long before it is attempted, a pattern thatargued about long before it is attempted, which is the pattern [[precautionary-principle|precautionary[[precautionary-principle|precautionary reasoning]] tends to produce.reasoning]] tends to produce. ## Alternatives and outlook## Alternatives and outlook The engineered alternative would be a uterus that is not donated at all. Groups including Brännström'sThe engineered alternative would be a uterus that is not donated at all. Groups includinghave recellularized [[decellularized-scaffolds|decellularized uterine scaffolds]] and reportedBrännström's have recellularized [[decellularized-scaffolds|decellularized uterine scaffolds]] andpregnancies in rats, and endometrial [[organoids]] reproduce part of the tissue's cyclical behaviourreported pregnancies in rats, and endometrial [[organoids]] reproduce part of the tissue's cyclicalin culture. Neither approaches a transplantable human organ, and the difficulty is the one that limitsbehaviour in culture. Neither approaches a transplantable human organ. The difficulty is the one[[lab-grown-organs]] and [[organ-bioprinting]] generally: building a vascular tree that can be plumbedthat limits [[lab-grown-organs]] and [[organ-bioprinting]] generally: building a vascular tree thatinto a circulation. A uterus built from a patient's own [[induced-pluripotent-stem-cells]] would removecan be plumbed into a circulation. A uterus built from a patient's ownboth the donor and the immunosuppression, which is why it appears in the field's own roadmaps as a[[induced-pluripotent-stem-cells]] would remove both the donor and the immunosuppression, and forlong-term goal rather than a near-term prospect.that reason it appears in the field's own roadmaps as a long-term goal rather than a near-termprospect. The instructive comparison is with the technologies that have not produced aThe instructive comparison is with the technologies that have not produced a child. [[ectogenesis]]child. [[ectogenesis]] in its complete form — gestation from fertilisation to term outside a body — has noin its complete form, gestation from fertilisation to term outside a body, has no demonstration indemonstration in any mammal, and the devices built so far take over a pregnancy already underway, inany mammal, and the devices built so far take over a pregnancy already underway, in sheep.sheep. [[in-vitro-gametogenesis]] has made functional gametes in mice and not in humans. Uterus[[in-vitro-gametogenesis]] has made functional gametes in mice and not in humans. Uterustransplantation reached live births by using an organ that already works, transplanted by methodstransplantation reached live births by using an organ that already works, transplanted by methodsadapted from other transplants, and accepting the costs of doing so. It is a reminder thatadapted from other transplants, and by accepting the costs of doing so. It is a reminder thatbiological problems are more often solved by moving working tissue than by manufacturing it, and thatbiological problems are more often solved by moving working tissue than by manufacturing it, andthe reproductive technology furthest from the futurist imagination is the one with children to showthat the reproductive technology furthest from the futurist imagination is the one with children tofor itself. Whether it becomes standard care for absolute uterine factor infertility or remains theshow for itself. Whether it becomes standard care for absolute uterine factor infertility or remainsspeciality of a few centres depends less on surgery than on whether health systems decide thatthe speciality of a few centres depends less on surgery than on whether health systems decide thatcarrying a pregnancy, as distinct from having a child, is a medical need they are obliged to meet.carrying a pregnancy, as distinct from having a child, is a medical need they are obliged to meet. ## See also## See alsoremoved, struck through added, underlinedLine numbers count the serialised markdown of each revision, frontmatter included.
129 lines are the same in both revisions, and 54 of them are not shown. Neither revision here is necessarily the current article — read Uterus transplantation for the text this wiki stands behind today.