Loading
What changed between revision 2 and revision 3, compared over the article's markdown source with its frontmatter — so a change to status, evidence or reversibility shows up as the edit it is.
Older · revision 2
Import
Re-import of content/humanity-plus.md — the file changed after the initial import. Not an edit.
12.4 kB
Revision 2
Revision 3
lines 7–13 → 7–136 unchanged lines not shown
categories: ["organizations", "people"]categories: ["organizations", "people"]tags: ["transhumanism", "movements", "advocacy", "bioethics", "nonprofit", "intellectual history"]tags: ["transhumanism", "movements", "advocacy", "bioethics", "nonprofit", "intellectual history"]summary: "The main international transhumanist membership organization, founded in 1998 as the World Transhumanist Association and now a small education and advocacy body."summary: "The main international transhumanist membership organization, founded in 1998 as the World Transhumanist Association and now a small education and advocacy body."updated: "2026-08-23"updated: "2026-10-29"issues: ["Membership size is not stated anywhere citable."]issues: ["Membership size is not stated anywhere citable."]------ lines 26–51 → 26–5112 unchanged lines not shown
}}`````` **Humanity+** is an international nonprofit membership organization founded in 1998 as the World Transhumanist Association to advocate for the ethical use of technology to extend human capacities. It was created as a deliberately academic and politically non-aligned alternative to [[extropianism]], and for roughly a decade it was the institutional centre of [[transhumanism]]. Its influence has since dispersed into specialized fields — AI safety, longevity biotech, bioethics — and the organization itself now operates at a much smaller scale, as an education and advocacy body.**Humanity+** is an international nonprofit membership organization founded in 1998 as the World Transhumanist Association to advocate for the ethical use of technology to extend human capacities. It was created as a deliberately academic and politically non-aligned alternative to [[extropianism]], and for roughly a decade it was the institutional centre of [[transhumanism]]. Its influence has since dispersed into specialized fields such as AI safety, longevity biotech and bioethics, and the organization itself now operates at a much smaller scale, as an education and advocacy body. ## Overview## Overview The WTA's founding purpose was to make transhumanism defensible in an academic seminar. Where the extropians had a libertarian politics, a self-consciously informal style and no peer-reviewed output, the new body offered a journal, a declaration written in the register of a human-rights document, and a leadership drawn from philosophy departments. It positioned transhumanism as a normative position about technology and human welfare rather than as a subculture.The WTA was founded to make transhumanism defensible in an academic seminar. The extropians had a libertarian politics, a self-consciously informal style and no peer-reviewed output. The new body offered a journal, a declaration written in the register of a human-rights document, and a leadership drawn from philosophy departments, and it presented transhumanism as a normative position about technology and human welfare rather than as a subculture. That repositioning worked at the level of ideas and less well at the level of the institution. The arguments the WTA promoted are now standard reference points in bioethics syllabi, while the organization that promoted them has few staff and little visible programme.The repositioning succeeded for the ideas more than for the institution. The arguments the WTA promoted are now standard reference points in bioethics syllabi, while the organization that promoted them has few staff and little visible programme. ## History## History [[nick-bostrom]], then a philosophy doctoral student, and David Pearce, author of the online manifesto *The Hedonistic Imperative*, founded the World Transhumanist Association in 1998. In the same period they issued the Transhumanist Declaration and launched what became the *Journal of Evolution and Technology*, the field's first peer-reviewed venue. Bostrom's own account traces the movement's lineage back through [[fm-2030]] and Julian Huxley to the Enlightenment, a genealogy that served the organization's purpose of establishing respectability as much as it did the historical record.[^bostrom2005b][[nick-bostrom]], then a philosophy doctoral student, and David Pearce, author of the online manifesto *The Hedonistic Imperative*, founded the World Transhumanist Association in 1998. In the same period they issued the Transhumanist Declaration and launched what became the *Journal of Evolution and Technology*, the field's first peer-reviewed venue. Bostrom's own account traces the movement's lineage through [[fm-2030]] and Julian Huxley back to the Enlightenment. That genealogy served the organization's need for respectability as much as it served the historical record.[^bostrom2005b] James Hughes, a sociologist and bioethicist, served as executive director in the mid-2000s and pushed the organization toward what he called democratic transhumanism: the position that enhancement technologies should be publicly regulated and universally accessible, and that a libertarian transhumanism would produce exactly the stratified outcome its critics predicted.[^hughes2004] This produced sustained internal conflict with the organization's libertarian membership, and Hughes left the WTA in the late 2000s. He and Bostrom had already founded a separate body, the Institute for Ethics and Emerging Technologies, in 2004.James Hughes, a sociologist and bioethicist, served as executive director in the mid-2000s and pushed the organization toward what he called democratic transhumanism: the position that enhancement technologies should be publicly regulated and universally accessible, and that a libertarian transhumanism would produce exactly the stratified outcome its critics predicted.[^hughes2004] The stance led to sustained conflict with the organization's libertarian membership, and Hughes left the WTA in the late 2000s. He and Bostrom had already founded a separate body, the Institute for Ethics and Emerging Technologies, in 2004. The renaming to Humanity+ in 2008 was accompanied by *H+ Magazine*, a consumer-facing publication, and by a series of conferences. [[natasha-vita-more]] chaired the organization and later served as executive director, bringing the design and arts strand of transhumanism into its official identity. She stepped down in December 2024, taking the title of president emeritus, and Edward Hudgins, a policy writer and founder of the Human Achievement Alliance, became executive director, with the board announcing that it was reassessing what the organization's next challenges should be.[^hplus2024]The organization was renamed Humanity+ in 2008 and launched *H+ Magazine*, a consumer-facing publication, along with a series of conferences. [[natasha-vita-more]] chaired the organization and later served as executive director, bringing the design and arts strand of transhumanism into its official identity. She stepped down in December 2024 and took the title of president emeritus. Edward Hudgins, a policy writer and founder of the Human Achievement Alliance, became executive director, and the board announced that it was reassessing what the organization's next challenges should be.[^hplus2024] ```timeline```timeline[[ { "year": "1998", "title": "World Transhumanist Association founded", "text": "Nick Bostrom and David Pearce establish a membership organization and publish the first Transhumanist Declaration." }, { "year": "1998", "title": "World Transhumanist Association founded", "text": "Nick Bostrom and David Pearce establish a membership organization and publish the first Transhumanist Declaration." }, { "year": "1998–1999", "title": "A journal", "text": "The Journal of Transhumanism, later the Journal of Evolution and Technology, gives the movement its first peer-reviewed outlet." }, { "year": "1998-1999", "title": "A journal", "text": "The Journal of Transhumanism, later the Journal of Evolution and Technology, gives the movement its first peer-reviewed outlet." }, { "year": "2004", "title": "The democratic turn", "text": "James Hughes's Citizen Cyborg argues for regulated, universally accessible enhancement, opening a lasting split with the libertarian membership." }, { "year": "2004", "title": "The democratic turn", "text": "James Hughes's Citizen Cyborg argues for regulated, universally accessible enhancement, opening a lasting split with the libertarian membership." }, { "year": "2008", "title": "Rebranding", "text": "The WTA becomes Humanity+ and launches H+ Magazine for a general readership." }, { "year": "2008", "title": "Rebranding", "text": "The WTA becomes Humanity+ and launches H+ Magazine for a general readership." }, { "year": "2009", "title": "Declaration revised", "text": "A rewritten Transhumanist Declaration is adopted, emphasizing risk, access and the moral standing of non-human minds." }, { "year": "2009", "title": "Declaration revised", "text": "A rewritten Transhumanist Declaration is adopted, emphasizing risk, access and the moral standing of non-human minds." },lines 56–91 → 56–914 unchanged lines not shown
## The Transhumanist Declaration## The Transhumanist Declaration The Declaration, first issued in 1998 and substantially rewritten in 2009, is the closest thing the movement has to a constitutional text. Its content is more cautious than the movement's reputation suggests. It asserts that humanity will be radically affected by technology and that the possibility of broadening human potential should be taken seriously; it also insists on the need to address catastrophic risks, on inclusion of the widest possible range of beneficiaries, and on the moral consideration of all sentient beings, whether human, animal, or artificial.The Declaration, first issued in 1998 and substantially rewritten in 2009, is the closest thing the movement has to a constitutional text, and it is more cautious than the movement's reputation suggests. It asserts that humanity will be radically affected by technology and that the possibility of broadening human potential should be taken seriously. It also insists on addressing catastrophic risks, on including the widest possible range of beneficiaries, and on the moral consideration of all sentient beings, whether human, animal or artificial. Three of its commitments are load-bearing for later disputes:Later disputes turn on three of its commitments: - **Reproductive and morphological autonomy.** Individuals should have wide latitude over their own bodies and reproduction, the position developed at length under [[morphological-freedom]].- **Reproductive and morphological autonomy.** Individuals should have wide latitude over their own bodies and reproduction, the position developed at length under [[morphological-freedom]].- **Risk seriousness.** Transhumanism is presented as compatible with, not opposed to, work on [[existential-risk]]; the Declaration predates Bostrom's central papers on the subject and anticipates them.- **Risk seriousness.** Transhumanism is presented as compatible with work on [[existential-risk]] rather than opposed to it; the Declaration predates Bostrom's central papers on the subject and anticipates them.- **Universal access.** Enhancement should not be confined to the wealthy, a commitment that the movement's critics regard as sincere but unmatched by any mechanism, and which is treated at length under [[access-and-inequality]].- **Universal access.** Enhancement should not be confined to the wealthy. The movement's critics regard this commitment as sincere but unmatched by any mechanism, a problem treated at length under [[access-and-inequality]]. > [!note] What the Declaration does not say> [!note] What the Declaration does not say> It contains no timeline, no endorsement of any specific technology, and no claim that any particular enhancement will work. Much of the criticism directed at transhumanism targets forecasts made by individual proponents such as [[ray-kurzweil]] rather than positions the organization has adopted.> It contains no timeline, endorses no specific technology, and makes no claim that any particular enhancement will work. Much of the criticism directed at transhumanism targets forecasts made by individual proponents such as [[ray-kurzweil]] rather than positions the organization has adopted. ## Programme and publications## Programme and publications The organization's substantive output was mostly textual. The *Journal of Evolution and Technology* published work on [[whole-brain-emulation]], [[personal-identity-and-continuity|personal identity]], enhancement ethics, and long-range forecasting, and gave academic authors a citable venue at a time when mainstream journals treated the topics as unserious. Bostrom's widely cited defence of posthuman dignity, written against Francis Fukuyama's arguments, came out of this period.[^bostrom2005]Most of the organization's substantive output was written. The *Journal of Evolution and Technology* published work on [[whole-brain-emulation]], [[personal-identity-and-continuity|personal identity]], enhancement ethics and long-range forecasting, and gave academic authors a citable venue at a time when mainstream journals treated these topics as unserious. Bostrom's widely cited defence of posthuman dignity, written against Francis Fukuyama's arguments, came out of this period.[^bostrom2005] *H+ Magazine* ran from 2008 into the 2010s under editor R. U. Sirius, covering the same subjects in a popular register. Humanity+ also ran conferences in the United States and Europe, and maintained national and regional chapters of varying activity, several of which outlived the parent body's momentum.*H+ Magazine* ran from 2008 into the 2010s under editor R. U. Sirius and covered the same subjects in a popular register. Humanity+ also held conferences in the United States and Europe and maintained national and regional chapters of varying activity, several of which kept going after the parent body lost momentum. The movement's principal anthology, *The Transhumanist Reader*, was edited by [[max-more]] and Vita-More and published in 2013.[^reader2013] It collects the founding documents of both the extropian and WTA traditions, and functions in practice as the movement's canon.The movement's principal anthology, *The Transhumanist Reader*, was edited by [[max-more]] and Vita-More and published in 2013.[^reader2013] It collects the founding documents of both the extropian and WTA traditions and functions in practice as the movement's canon. ## Reception## Reception Academic reception has been mixed and largely independent of the organization. Bostrom's and Hughes's arguments were engaged seriously by bioethicists including [[julian-savulescu]] on the supportive side and Leon Kass, Michael Sandel and Fukuyama on the critical side, and the resulting exchange is the substance of [[bioethics-of-enhancement]] as a subfield. Whether Humanity+ as an institution contributed much to that exchange beyond providing a venue is debatable.Academic reception has been mixed and has proceeded largely independently of the organization. Bioethicists engaged seriously with Bostrom's and Hughes's arguments, [[julian-savulescu]] on the supportive side and Leon Kass, Michael Sandel and Fukuyama on the critical side, and that exchange is the substance of [[bioethics-of-enhancement]] as a subfield. Whether Humanity+ as an institution contributed much to it beyond providing a venue is debatable. The most durable criticism of the organization is that it never resolved the tension Hughes identified. A movement whose declared commitment is universal access, and whose membership is drawn heavily from people who can afford private enhancement, has an unmet burden of explanation. [[bioconservatism|Bioconservative]] critics pressed a different charge: that the Declaration's careful language concealed a substantive view of what humans should become, and that the movement's tolerance for the [[posthuman]] as an end-state is not neutral between conceptions of the good.The most durable criticism of the organization is that it never resolved the tension Hughes identified. A movement that declares a commitment to universal access, and whose membership is drawn heavily from people who can afford private enhancement, has an unmet burden of explanation. [[bioconservatism|Bioconservative]] critics pressed a different charge: that the Declaration's careful language concealed a substantive view of what humans should become, and that the movement's tolerance for the [[posthuman]] as an end-state is not neutral between conceptions of the good. ## Current activity## Current activity As of 2026 Humanity+ continues to operate, but as a small education and advocacy body rather than the institutional centre it once was. Its own announcement of the December 2024 leadership change put total donations raised over Vita-More's tenure at just over $400,000 — a figure that locates the organization's scale more precisely than any description could — and listed its programmes as summits, workshops and the H+ Academy webinar series.[^hplus2024] Its current site presents the organization as education-focused, with a webinar series, an AI advisory board, and an annual Longevity Day observance; the large conferences and *H+ Magazine* are described in the past tense.[^hplus2026] This is not a scandal so much as a succession. The specific concerns that motivated the WTA are now pursued by organizations with money and staff: AI risk by dedicated research institutes, life extension by companies such as [[altos-labs]] and [[retro-biosciences]] and by prize bodies such as [[xprize-healthspan]], neural interface ethics by the [[neurorights]] campaign. The umbrella organization proved less durable than the topics it assembled.As of 2026 Humanity+ continues to operate, but as a small education and advocacy body rather than the institutional centre it once was. Its own announcement of the December 2024 leadership change put total donations raised over Vita-More's tenure at just over $400,000, a more exact measure of the organization's scale than any description, and listed its programmes as summits, workshops and the H+ Academy webinar series.[^hplus2024] Its current site presents the organization as education-focused, with a webinar series, an AI advisory board and an annual Longevity Day observance, and describes the large conferences and *H+ Magazine* in the past tense.[^hplus2026] The change reads more as a succession than a scandal. Organizations with money and staff now pursue the specific concerns that motivated the WTA: dedicated research institutes work on AI risk; companies such as [[altos-labs]] and [[retro-biosciences]] and prize bodies such as [[xprize-healthspan]] work on life extension; the [[neurorights]] campaign takes up neural interface ethics. The umbrella organization proved less durable than the topics it brought together. The open question is whether transhumanism still needs a general institution. The arguments have professionalized and separated; a bioethicist working on [[germline-editing]] governance and an engineer working on [[brain-computer-interface]] bandwidth now have little occasion to meet under a shared banner. Whether anything is lost when that connective tissue disappears is unresolved, and the case that something is lost rests on the observation that the field's most consequential questions — about identity, access and what is worth becoming — belong to none of the specialties individually.The open question is whether transhumanism still needs a general institution. The arguments have professionalized and separated, and a bioethicist working on [[germline-editing]] governance and an engineer working on [[brain-computer-interface]] bandwidth now have little occasion to meet under a shared banner. Whether anything is lost when that connective tissue disappears is unresolved. The case that something is lost rests on the observation that the field's most consequential questions, about identity, access and what is worth becoming, belong to none of the specialties individually. ## See also## See also lines 104–109 → 104–10912 unchanged lines not shown
[^bostrom2005]: `paper` Bostrom, N. "In Defense of Posthuman Dignity." *Bioethics*, 2005.[^bostrom2005]: `paper` Bostrom, N. "In Defense of Posthuman Dignity." *Bioethics*, 2005.[^reader2013]: `book` More, M. and Vita-More, N. (eds.) *The Transhumanist Reader*. Wiley-Blackwell, 2013.[^reader2013]: `book` More, M. and Vita-More, N. (eds.) *The Transhumanist Reader*. Wiley-Blackwell, 2013.[^bostrom2005b]: `paper` Bostrom, N. "A History of Transhumanist Thought." *Journal of Evolution and Technology*, 2005. {A history of the movement written by one of its founders and published in the journal the organization itself launched.}[^bostrom2005b]: `paper` Bostrom, N. "A History of Transhumanist Thought." *Journal of Evolution and Technology*, 2005. {A history of the movement written by one of its founders and published in the journal the organization itself launched.}[^hplus2024]: `statement` Humanity+. "Changes at Humanity+ — Our Future Path." humanityplus.org, December 2024. {The organization's own announcement of the Vita-More–Hudgins transition; the donation total and programme list are its self-report, not an audited account.}[^hplus2024]: `statement` Humanity+. "Changes at Humanity+ — Our Future Path." humanityplus.org, December 2024. {The organization's own announcement of the transition from Vita-More to Hudgins; the donation total and programme list are its self-report, not an audited account.}[^hplus2026]: `statement` Humanity+. humanityplus.org, accessed August 2026. {The organization's current self-description; it records what the site presents as active, which is not evidence of the scale at which any of it runs.}[^hplus2026]: `statement` Humanity+. humanityplus.org, accessed August 2026. {The organization's current self-description; it records what the site presents as active, which is not evidence of the scale at which any of it runs.} removed, struck through added, underlinedLine numbers count the serialised markdown of each revision, frontmatter included.
88 lines are the same in both revisions, and 34 of them are not shown. Neither revision here is necessarily the current article — read Humanity+ for the text this wiki stands behind today.